Search: +meta:BP866
|
| |
|
| BP879 |
| Solution involves one absolute quantity vs. solution involves relative quantity (comparing two quantities). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP880 |
| Non-overlapping sides (patterns are disjoint) vs. possible object(s) could fit in overlap of sides (patterns intersect). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP881 |
| Right pattern is proper subset of left pattern vs. right pattern is not subset of left pattern. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
You can try to interpret these images as Bongard Problems. This works just when the left side includes no objects that would fit in with the right side (as in EX7357 but not EX7361), the solution is "not [right pattern] vs. [right pattern]"; otherwise there is no apparent solution.
The solvable Bongard Problems sorted left here are right-narrow and not left-narrow, with the left side the negation of the right side (see notso). |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP876 BP877 BP878 BP879 BP880 * BP882 BP883 BP884 BP885 BP886
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
abstract, handed, leftright, meta (see left/right), miniproblems, creativeexamples, assumesfamiliarity, structure, presentationinvariant
|
|
|
WORLD
|
bpimage_shapes_nosoln_allowed [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP893 |
| As one quantity increases an equally obvious opposite quantity decreases vs. there is only one obvious quantity, which increases as the sequence progresses right. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Another way of phrasing the solution: "Neither direction would more naturally be called increase in quantity vs. rightward progression would be called an increase."
Most right examples shown are unboundedly increasing, since finite sequences showing a quantity increasing usually also suggest "distance to end of sequence" as a decreasing opposite quantity. Even so, there are some finite sequences with one direction more intuitively increase-like than the other. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP888 BP889 BP890 BP891 BP892 * BP894 BP895 BP896 BP897 BP898
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
creativeexamples, structure, rules
|
|
|
WORLD
|
constant_change_seq_increase_right [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP894 |
| Examples fit solution (once it is known) relatively obviously vs. examples fit solution in subtle or complex, harder-to-see ways. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
One left and one right example with each solution are shown for help.
This BP is fuzzy for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is subjective. Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."
Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
See keyword help.
See keyword hardsort.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP889 BP890 BP891 BP892 BP893 * BP895 BP896 BP897 BP898 BP899
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
fuzzy, abstract, notso, subjective, meta (see left/right), miniproblems, creativeexamples, presentationmatters, assumesfamiliarity, structure, contributepairs
|
|
|
WORLD
|
boxes_bpimage_three_per_side [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP917 |
| Reversible transformations vs. non-reversible transformations. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP946 |
| Can be constructed using 2 identical copies of an image (full overlapping not allowed) vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
"Full overlapping not allowed" means you cannot overlay an image onto itself without moving it; if this were allowed all images would be sorted on the left. The copies can be moved around (translated) in 2D but can not be flipped or rotated.
There are examples on the right drawn with thick lines, and these could be created by copying an image with slightly thinner lines and moving it over a tiny amount. If you fix this issue by saying "the copy has to be moved over more than a tiny amount" then the Bongard Problem is perfect but not precise, but if you fix this issue by saying "interpret the figures as made up of (infinitesimally) thin lines" then it's precise but not perfect. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Jun 17 2023 |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP941 BP942 BP943 BP944 BP945 * BP947 BP948 BP949 BP950 BP951
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nice, notso, creativeexamples
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP955 |
| Images of Bongard Problems that sort an image of their left side on their left and an image of their right side on their left vs. images of Bongard Problems that sort an image of their left side on their right and an image of their right side on their right. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
See also BP957 for the other two evident possibilities.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP950 BP951 BP952 BP953 BP954 * BP956 BP957 BP958 BP959 BP960
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
abstract, dual, handed, leftright, solved, meta (see left/right), miniproblems, creativeexamples, assumesfamiliarity, structure, experimental
|
|
|
CONCEPT
|
self-reference (info | search)
|
|
|
WORLD
|
oblong_boxes_bpimage_sorts_both_sides_skewed [smaller | same | bigger]
zoom in left (oblong_boxes_bpimage_sorts_both_sides_left) | zoom in right (oblong_boxes_bpimage_sorts_both_sides_right)
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
