One left and one right example with each solution are shown for @help.

This BP is @fuzzy for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is @subjective. Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."

Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems.

One left and one right example with each solution are shown for @help.

This BP is @fuzzy for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is @subjective. Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."

One left and one right example with each solution are shown for @help.

This BP is @fuzzy for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is @subjective. Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."

Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems.

One left and one right example with each solution are shown.

This BP is @fuzzy for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is @subjective. Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."

Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems.

See keyword @help.

See keyword @hardsort.

See BP930 (keyword @help).

One left and one right example with each solution are shown.

This BP is "fuzzy" (right-BP508) for multiple reasons. How obvious it is that an example fits a rule is subjective (left-BP520). Also, somebody could read the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-read way."

Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems.

Whether this Bongard Problem solution would categorize an image of itself left or right depends on the difficulty of the solutions of the mini-Problems.

One left and one right example with each solution are shown.

Sorting is fuzzy (right-BP508) for multiple reasons. Obviousness is subjective. Also, somebody could parse the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way."

Whether this Bongard Problem would categorize an image of itself left or right would depend on the difficulty of the solution properties of the mini-Problems.

One left and one right example with each solution are shown.

Sorting is fuzzy (right-BP508) for multiple reasons. Obviousness is subjective. Also, somebody could parse the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way."

Whether this Bongard Problem would categorize an image of itself left or right would depend on the difficulty of the solution properties of the mini-Problems.

Sorting is fuzzy (right-BP508) for multiple reasons. Obviousness is subjective. Also, somebody could parse the simplicity of all included examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the more obvious version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way vs. non-square small number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way."

Whether this Bongard Problem would categorize an image of itself left or right would depend on the difficulty of the solution properties of the mini-Problems.

Somebody could also parse the simplicity of examples as part of a Bongard Problem's solution. For example, the simple version of "square number of dots vs. non-square number of dots" could be interpreted as "small square number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way vs. small non-square number of dots arranged in easy-to-parse way."

See BP930.

Examples fit solution (once it is known) relatively obviously vs. examples fit solution in subtle or complex, harder-to-see ways.

Examples fit solution (once it is known) relatively obviously vs. examples fit solution in subtle or complex harder-to-see ways.

Whether this Bongard Problem would categorize an image of itself left or right would depend on the difficulty of the solution properties of the mini-Problems.

Aaron David Fairbanks

Metaworld Bongard Problems for sub-worlds of points (BP893) vs. other metaworld Bongard Problems.

Aaron David Fairbanks