Search: supworld:metaconcept
|
|
BP1074 |
| Meta Bongard Problem in a chain of Problems containing other Problems that eventually loops back to itself vs. this cannot happen. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1076 |
| Meta Bongard Problems sorting BP1 left vs. meta Bongard Problems sorting BP1 right. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1078 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: semidecidable vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1103 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: cube vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1106 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: turning black regions white & white regions black vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1111 |
| Bongard Problem requires solver to already be interpreting all examples in a specific way for the answer to seem simple vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assumesfamiliarity" on the OEBP.
Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.
For example, all meta Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.
TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assumesfamiliarity" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assumesfamiliarity" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are interpreted as Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021 |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Many Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword structure) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.
Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword consistentsymbols).
Bongard Problems tagged math often assume the solver is familiar with a certain representation of a math idea.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1106 BP1107 BP1108 BP1109 BP1110  *  BP1112 BP1113 BP1114 BP1115 BP1116
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
BP1032: The solution should really read "Assuming all images are Bongard Problems sorting each natural number left or right ..." This Bongard Problem makes sense to someone who has been solving a series of similar BPs, but otherwise there is no reason to automatically read a collection of numbers as standing for a larger collection of numbers. |
|
KEYWORD
|
fuzzy, meta (see left/right), links, keyword
|
|
WORLD
|
bp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
|
|
|
BP1117 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: topological density vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1126 |
| Meta Bongard Problems in which examples are pages on the OEBP vs. meta Bongard Problems in which examples are pictures of Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "links" on the OEBP.
Bongard Problems sorted right have the keyword "miniproblems" on the OEBP.
The keyword "links" is automatically added to a Bongard Problem on the OEBP if a BP number is added as an example.
Meta Bongard problems that sort Bongard Problems purely based on their solutions (keyword presentationmatters) usually have two versions in the database: one that sorts images of Bongard Problems and one that sorts links to pages on the OEBP. If both versions exist, users should make them cross-reference one another. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
All the examples of miniature Bongard Problems within any meta Bongard Problem tagged "miniproblems" would fit left on BP1080 (which is a showcase of the various formats for images of Bongard Problems).
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1121 BP1122 BP1123 BP1124 BP1125  *  BP1127 BP1128 BP1129 BP1130 BP1131
|
|
KEYWORD
|
meta (see left/right), links, keyword, world, left-self, metameta
|
|
WORLD
|
metabp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|