Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assumesfamiliarity" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.

For example, all @meta Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assumesfamiliarity" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assumesfamiliarity" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are interpreted as Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Many Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword @structure) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword @consistentsymbols).

Bongard Problems tagged @math often assume the solver is familiar with a certain representation of a math idea.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assumesfamiliarity" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assumesfamiliarity" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assumesfamiliarity" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are interpreted as Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Many Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword "structure" left-BP789) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "consistentsymbols" left-BP838).

Bongard Problems tagged "math" (left-BP571) often assume the solver is familiar with a certain representation of a math idea.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assumesfamiliarity" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assumesfamiliarity" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assumesfamiliarity" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Some Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword "structure" left-BP789) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "consistentsymbols" left-BP838).

BP1032: The solution should really read "Assuming all images are Bongard Problems sorting each natural number left or right ..." This Bongard Problem makes sense to someone who has been solving a series of similar BPs, but otherwise there is no reason to automatically read a collection of numbers as standing for a larger collection of numbers.

BP1032: The solution should really read "Assuming all images are Bongard Problems sorting each natural number left or right ..." This Bongard Problem This makes sense to someone who has been solving a series of similar BPs, but otherwise there is no reason to automatically read a collection of numbers as standing for a larger collection of numbers.

Some Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword "structure" left-BP789) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "consistentlanguage" left-BP838).

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. The solver needs to be able to understand the representation for the idea to seem simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

Sometimes all the examples need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. The solver needs to be able to understand the representation for the idea to seem simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

There are some Bongard Problems on this website in which all the examples need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. The solver needs to be able to understand the representation for the idea to seem simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Some Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword "structure" left-BP789) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "symboliccontext" left-BP838).

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

There are many simple ideas for Bongard Problems about structures that are not so simple to draw. The solver needs to be able to understand the representation for the idea to seem simple.

For example, all meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

There are many simple ideas for Bongard Problems about structures that are not so simple to draw. The solver needs to be able to understand the representation for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to, without mention, expect a BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would then only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assuming" on the OEBP.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Perhaps it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to, without mention, expect a BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would then only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems.

Some Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword "structure" left-BP789) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand a set of symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "symboliccontext" left-BP838).

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Perhaps it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to, without mention, expect a BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would then only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems.

Bongard Problems involving a complicated structure (keyword "structure" left-BP789) often assume the solver already knows what that structure is.

Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand a set of symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword "symboliccontext" left-BP838).

Bongard Problems involving a complicated structure (keyword "structure" left-BP789) often assume the solver already knows what that structure is.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Perhaps it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to, without mention, expect a BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would then only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems.

Bongard Problems involving a complicated structure (keyword "structure" left-BP789) often assume the solver already knows what that structure is.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Perhaps it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on meta-Bongard Problems. Since there are so many meta-BPs, it may be more useful to, without mention, expect a BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems.

Bongard Problems involving a complicated structure (keyword "structure" left-BP789) often assume the solver already knows what that structure is.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.

All meta-Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.

TO DO: Perhaps it is best to stop putting the label "assuming" on meta-Bongard Problems. Since there are so many meta-BPs, it may be more useful to, without mention, expect the BP-solver can recognize what a BP is. We would only use the "assuming" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are Bongard Problems.

Bongard Problems involving a complicated structure (keyword "structure" left-BP789) often assume the solver already knows what that structure is.

"Assuming" BPs can come from simple abstract ideas that are difficult to put in a picture. The chosen representation may not be so simple, and the solver needs to be able to read it for the idea to seem simple.