Search: all
|
| |
|
| BP1109 |
| Considering only the ways they are connected, anything that can be said about a given edge can be said about every other edge vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1110 |
| The process that turns one object into the other is the same both ways vs. the process changes depending on which object is chosen as the starting point. |
|
| ?
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1111 |
| Bongard Problem requires solver to already be interpreting all examples in a specific way for the answer to seem simple vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "assumesfamiliarity" on the OEBP.
Sometimes all the examples in a Bongard Problem need to be interpreted a certain way for the Bongard Problem to make sense. Only once the representation is understood, the idea seems simple.
For example, all meta Bongard Problems (Bongard Problems sorting other Bongard Problems) assume the solver interprets the examples as Bongard Problems.
TO DO: Maybe it is best to stop putting the label "assumesfamiliarity" on all meta-Bongard Problems. There are so many of them. It may be better to only use the "assumesfamiliarity" keyword on meta-BPs for a further assumption than just that all examples are interpreted as Bongard Problems. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Feb 11 2021 |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Many Bongard Problems in which all examples take the same format (keyword structure) assume the solver already knows how to read that format.
Some Bongard Problems assume the solver will be able to understand symbolism that is consistent between examples (keyword consistentsymbols).
Bongard Problems tagged math often assume the solver is familiar with a certain representation of a math idea.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1106 BP1107 BP1108 BP1109 BP1110 * BP1112 BP1113 BP1114 BP1115 BP1116
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
BP1032: The solution should really read "Assuming all images are Bongard Problems sorting each natural number left or right ..." This Bongard Problem makes sense to someone who has been solving a series of similar BPs, but otherwise there is no reason to automatically read a collection of numbers as standing for a larger collection of numbers. |
|
|
KEYWORD
|
fuzzy, meta (see left/right), links, keyword
|
|
|
WORLD
|
bp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1112 |
| "Stretch-dependent" Bongard Problems vs. Bongard Problems in which examples can be stretched (or compressed) along any axis without being sorted differently. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1113 |
| Bongard Problems relating to the OEBP vs. Bongard Problems unrelated to the OEBP. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1114 |
| Fractals contain one another vs. only one contains the other. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1115 |
| Fractals tile one another vs. not so (fractals are rather tiled by some combination of one another and themselves). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1116 |
| Contains self somewhere within any area around any point within self vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
