Left examples have the keyword "perfect" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate."

The label "ignoreimperfections" means this caveat is indeed required. The label "perfect" means even the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise, or precision doesn't matter (keyword "continuous" right-BP963).

Even in BPs tagged "perfect", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "perfect" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details at all would be tagged "perfect". However, sometimes the small details are intended to be noticed, but certain imperfections are still intended to be overlooked.

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact" (left-BP508).

"Continuous" (right-BP963) implies "perfect".

"Pixelperfect" (left-BP947) implies "perfect".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact" (left-BP508).

"Continuous" (left-BP963) implies "perfect".

"Pixelperfect" (left-BP947) implies "perfect".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

"Continuous" (left-BP963) implies "perfect".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

Left examples have the keyword "perfect" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate."

The label "ignoreimperfections" means this caveat is indeed required. The label "perfect" means even the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise, or precision doesn't matter (keyword "continuous" left-BP963).

Even in BPs tagged "perfect", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "perfect" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details at all would be tagged "perfect". However, sometimes the small details are intended to be noticed, but certain imperfections are still intended to be overlooked.

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

"Continuous" (left-BP963) implies "perfect".

"Continuous" (left-BP913) AND "perfect" implies "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

Many Bongard Problems involving properties of curves (e.g. BP62) really are about those wiggly, imperfect curves; they qualify as "perfect" problems. On the other hand, Bongard Problems involving polygons, (e.g. BP5) often show only approximately-straight lines; they are not "perfect" problems.

Bongard Problems with world "bmp" should be "perfect".

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

"Continuous" (left-BP963) implies "imperfectionscanmatter".

"Imperfectionscanmatter" (left-BP913) AND "continuous" (left-BP963) implies "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

"Continuous" (left-BP963) implies "imperfectionscanmatter".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

Bongard Problems that are not "continuous" (left-BP963) are usually tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate."

The label "ignoreimperfections" means this caveat is indeed required. The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means even the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise, or precision doesn't matter (keyword "continuous" left-BP963).

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details at all would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter". However, sometimes the small details are intended to be noticed, but certain imperfections are still intended to be overlooked.

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate."

The label "ignoreimperfections" means this caveat is indeed required. The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means even the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise, or precision doesn't matter.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details at all would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter". However, sometimes the small details are intended to be noticed, but certain imperfections are still intended to be overlooked.

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

Bongard Problems that are not "continuous" (left-BP963) are usually tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", and Bongard Problems that are tagged "ignoreimperfections are usually "continuous".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate."

The label "ignoreimperfections" means this caveat is indeed required. The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means even the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise, or precision doesn't matter.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

Bongard Problems that are not "continuous" (left-BP963) are usually tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

Bongard Problems that are not "continuous" (left-BP963) are usually tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

The keywords "proofsrequired" and "noproofs" (right-BP1125) have a similar relationship: "noproofs" indicates a lenience for a certain kind of imperfection.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "ignoreimperfections".

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

BP119 ("small correction results in circle vs. not") is an interesting example: imperfections matter with respect to the outline being closed, but imperfections do not matter with respect to circularness.

See BP508 for discussion of this topic in relation to Bongard Problems tagged "exact".

Bongard Problems that are not "continuous" (left-BP963) are usually tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be interpreted as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is about those imperfections.

Usually a Bongard Problem involving small details would be tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", but not always.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be interpreted as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter".

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be interpreted as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", e.g. BP148 or BP119.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given the resolution.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be parsed as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is explicitly about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", e.g. BP148 or BP119.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

E.g., for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given their resolutions.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be parsed as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is explicitly about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", e.g. BP148 or BP119.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant would drop this caveat; images are meant to be precise.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

e.g. for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given their resolutions.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be parsed as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is explicitly about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", e.g. BP148 or BP119.

Left examples have the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" on the OEBP.

Consider the difference in style between BP344 and BP24; the former shapes show significant subtleties in the edges, while the latter are sketches of circles, squares, and triangles, just approximate enough to tell which are which.

Hand-drawn figures in BPs are typically imperfect. A "circles vs. squares" BP may only show what are approximately circles and approximately squares. A pedant might append to the solutions of all Bongard Problems the caveat "...when figures are interpreted as the most obvious shapes they approximate." The label "imperfectionscanmatter" means the pedant may drop this caveat; images are precise geometrical figures.

Even in BPs tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", the tiny rough edges caused by image pixelation are not expected to matter. If the OEBP would indeed prefer users only upload pixel-perfect examples, a BP can be tagged with the stricter keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

e.g. for BPs having to do with smooth curves and lines, "imperfectionscanmatter" only requires images offer the best possible approximation of those intended shapes given their resolutions.

Note: Regardless of whether a BP is tagged imperfectionscanmatter or not, .svg scalable vector graphics files are always assumed to be parsed as their literal geometry. Do not upload .svg files with imperfections, unless the BP solution is explicitly about those imperfections.

A Bongard Problem can involve some small details without being tagged "imperfectionscanmatter", e.g. BP148 or BP119.