Search: author:Leo Crabbe
|
|
BP816 |
| Cross section of a cylinder vs. not cross section of a cylinder |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP799 |
| Position-independent Bongard Problems where positioning varies vs. position-independent Bongard Problems where positioning is consistent |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
All examples in this Problem are position-independent Bongard Problems.
Positioning here includes objects' positions within the panels and objects' positions relative to each other.
There are very subtle distinctions to be made between the usage of variance of position in these BPs for the sake of noise (obscuring the solution eg. BP557), clarity (generalising the solution to make it more fundamental eg. BP79) or help (aiding the observer in finding the solution eg. BP334). There is certainly a degree of overlap between these three definitions, they are not disconnected. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP794 BP795 BP796 BP797 BP798  *  BP800 BP801 BP802 BP803 BP804
|
|
KEYWORD
|
meta (see left/right), links
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
|
|
|
|
BP787 |
| Ordered pairwise comparison Bongard Problems vs. unordered pairwise comparison Bongard Problems |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP569 |
| Triangular number of dots vs. non-triangular number of dots |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
All examples in this Problem are groups of black dots.
The nth triangular number is the sum over the natural numbers from 1 to n, where n > 0. Note: 0 is the 0th triangular number. The first few triangular numbers are 0, 1, 3 (= 1+2) and 6 (= 1+2+3) |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP564 BP565 BP566 BP567 BP568  *  BP570 BP571 BP572 BP573 BP574
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nice, precise, allsorted, notso, number, math, left-narrow, left-null, help, preciseworld
|
|
WORLD
|
dots [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
|
|
|
|
BP565 |
| Bongard Problems that are hard for humans to solve but easier for computers to solve vs. Bongard Problems that are hard for computers to solve but easier for humans to solve. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP564 |
| Discrete points intersecting boundary of convex hull vs. connected segment intersecting boundary of convex hull |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
If a "string" is wound tightly around the shape, does one of its segments lie directly on the shape?
All examples in this Problem are connected line segments or curves.
We are taking lines here to be infinitely thin, so that if the boundary of the convex hull intersects the endpoint of a line exactly it is understood that they meet at 1 point. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP559 BP560 BP561 BP562 BP563  *  BP565 BP566 BP567 BP568 BP569
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
Imagine wrapping a string around the pointed star. This string would take the shape of the boundary of the star's convex hull (a regular pentagon), and would only touch the star at the end of each of its 5 individual tips, therefore the star belongs on the left. |
|
KEYWORD
|
hard, nice, allsorted, solved, perfect
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
|
|
|
|
BP563 |
| Bongard Problems such that there is a way of making an infinite list of all relevant possible left-sorted examples vs. Bongard Problems where there is no such way of listing all left-sorted examples. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left-sorted Problems have the keyword "left-listable" on the OEBP.
All the possible left examples for the BPs on the left side of this problem could be listed in one infinite sequence. Right examples here are Problems for which no such sequence can exist.
This depends on deciding what images should be considered "the same thing", which is subjective and context-dependent.
All examples in this Bongard Problem have an infinite left side (they do not have the keyword left-finite).
The mathematical term for a set that can be organized into an infinite list is a "countably infinite" set, as opposed to an "uncountably infinite" set.
Another related idea is a "recursively enumerable" a.k.a. "semi-decidable" set, which is a set that a computer program could list the members of.
The keyword "left-listable" is meant to be for the more general idea of a countable set, which does not have to do with computer algorithms.
Note that this is not just BP940 (right-listable) flipped.
It seems in practice, Bongard Problems that are left-listable are usually also right-listable because the whole class of relevant examples is listable. A keyword for just plain "listable" may be more useful. Or instead keywords for left- versus right- semidecidability, in the sense of computing. - Aaron David Fairbanks, Jan 10 2023 |
|
REFERENCE
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable_set |
|
CROSSREFS
|
See left-finite, which distinguishes between a finite left side and infinite left side.
"Left-listable" BPs are typically precise.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP558 BP559 BP560 BP561 BP562  *  BP564 BP565 BP566 BP567 BP568
|
|
KEYWORD
|
math, meta (see left/right), links, keyword
|
|
WORLD
|
bp_infinite_left_examples [smaller | same | bigger] zoom in right (left_uncountable_bp)
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
|
|
|
|
BP559 |
| Cross section of a cube vs. not cross section of a cube |
|
| ?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|