Search: https://www.galaxus.ch/en/sector/showdiscussion/snapchathacking-visit-kunghaccom-5hflaboo-226168
|
| |
|
| BP159 |
| Two clusters of 2+3, middle shape must be seen as rectangle (AND only one linelike shape) vs. two clusters of 2+3, middle shape must be seen as piece of straight line (AND more than one linelike shape). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1066 |
| Some region has one box in it vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP137 |
| Dots equal in number to the sides of the closed region vs. dots unequal in number to the sides of the closed region. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP144 |
| Two clusters of three and two: different features (including clustering) yield different 3-2 splits vs. two clusters of three and two: different features yield the same 3-2 split. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP360 |
| Order is high (low entropy) vs. order is low (high entropy). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP192 |
| Elongated vertically vs. elongated horizontally. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1050 |
| One color is multiple of the other vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP981 |
| Grid of analogies vs. different kind of rule. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
On the left, each row and column could be labeled by a certain object or concept; on the right this is not so.
More specifically: on the left, each row and each column is associated with a certain object or concept; there is a rule for combining rows and columns to give images; it would be possible without changing the rule to extend with new rows/columns or delete/reorder any existing columns. On the right, this is not so; the rule might be about how the images must relate to their neighbors, for example.
All examples show grids of squares with an image in each square, such that there is some "rule" the images within the grid obey.
Left examples are a generalized version of the analogy grids seen in BP361. Any analogy a : b :: c : d shown in a 2x2 grid will fit on the left here.
To word the solution with mathematical jargon, "defines a (simply described) map from the Cartesian product of two sets vs. not so." Another equivalent solution is "columns (alternatively, rows) illustrate a consistent set of one-input operations." It is always possible to imagine the columns as inputs and the rows as operations and vice versa.
There is a trivial way in which any example can be interpreted so that it fits on the left side: imagine each row is assigned the list of all the squares in that row and each column is assigned its number, counting from the left. But each grid has a clear rule that is simpler than this. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
BP1258 is a similar idea: "any square removed could be reconstructed vs. not." Examples included left here usually fit left there, but some do not e.g. EX9998.
See BP979 for use of similar structures but with one square removed from the grid.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP976 BP977 BP978 BP979 BP980  *  BP982 BP983 BP984 BP985 BP986
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nice, convoluted, unwordable, notso, teach, structure, rules, grid, miniworlds
|
|
|
CONCEPT
|
analogy (info | search)
|
|
|
WORLD
|
grid_of_images_with_rule [smaller | same | bigger] zoom in left (grid_of_analogies)
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|