Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP161 BP162 BP163 BP164 BP165  *  BP167 BP168 BP169 BP170 BP171

traditional

Multiple options:
dot_clusters [smaller | same | bigger],
point_clusters [smaller | same | bigger]

Harry E. Foundalis

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP162 BP163 BP164 BP165 BP166  *  BP168 BP169 BP170 BP171 BP172

traditional

Multiple options:
dot_clusters [smaller | same | bigger],
point_clusters [smaller | same | bigger]

Harry E. Foundalis

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP313 BP314 BP315 BP316 BP317  *  BP319 BP320 BP321 BP322 BP323

nice, traditional

dot_clusters [smaller | same | bigger]

Aaron David Fairbanks

See BP334 for a version of the same idea, but using arbitrary shapes instead of dots.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP329 BP330 BP331 BP332 BP333  *  BP335 BP336 BP337 BP338 BP339

precise, allsorted, number, math, left-narrow, right-narrow, right-null, help, traditional, preciseworld

dots [smaller | same | bigger]

Aaron David Fairbanks

All examples in this Problem are a collection of dots.

An equivalent solution is "Dots can be arranged into a square lattice whose convex hull is a square vs. not so". - Leo Crabbe, Aug 01 2020

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP379 BP380 BP381 BP382 BP383  *  BP385 BP386 BP387 BP388 BP389

A single dot fits because 1 = 1*1.

A pair of dots does not fit because there is no integer x such that 2 = x*x.

nice, precise, allsorted, number, math, left-narrow, left-null, help, traditional, preciseworld, collection

dots [smaller | same | bigger]

Jago Collins

This refers to all Bongard Problem solution ideas. No need to be a particularly well-made or well-defined Bongard Problem.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP536 BP537 BP538 BP539 BP540  *  BP542 BP543 BP544 BP545 BP546

notso, meta (see left/right), links, world, left-self, right-null, left-it, feedback

everything [smaller | same]
zoom in left (bp)

Aaron David Fairbanks

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP537 BP538 BP539 BP540 BP541  *  BP543 BP544 BP545 BP546 BP547

notso, meta (see left/right), links, oebp, world, left-self, right-null, left-it, feedback

everything [smaller | same]
zoom in left (bppage)

Aaron David Fairbanks

All ideas and things, with no limits.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP539 BP540 BP541 BP542 BP543  *  BP545 BP546 BP547 BP548 BP549

notso, meta (see left/right), links, world, left-self, right-finite, right-full, left-null, left-it, feedback, experimental, funny

everything [smaller | same]
zoom in left (everything) | zoom in right (nothing)

Aaron David Fairbanks

All examples in this Problem are groups of black dots.

The nth triangular number is the sum over the natural numbers from 1 to n, where n > 0. Note: 0 is the 0th triangular number. The first few triangular numbers are 0, 1, 3 (= 1+2) and 6 (= 1+2+3)

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP564 BP565 BP566 BP567 BP568  *  BP570 BP571 BP572 BP573 BP574

nice, precise, allsorted, notso, number, math, left-narrow, left-null, help, preciseworld

dots [smaller | same | bigger]

Leo Crabbe

Left-sorted BPs have the keyword "notso" on the OEBP.

This meta Bongard Problem is about Bongard Problems featuring two rules that are conceptual opposites.

Sometimes both sides could be seen as the "not" side: consider, for example, two definitions of the same Bongard Problem, "shape has hole vs. does not" and "shape is not filled vs. is". It is possible (albeit perhaps unnatural) to phrase the solution either way when the left and right sides partition all possible relevant examples cleanly into two groups (see the allsorted keyword).

When one property is "positive-seeming" and its opposite is "negative-seeming", it usually means the positive property would be recognized without counter-examples (e.g. a collection of triangles will be seen as such), while the negative property wouldn't be recognized without counter-examples (e.g. a collection of "non-triangle shapes" will just be interpreted as "shapes" unless triangles are shown opposite them).

BP513 (keyword left-narrow) is about Bongard Problems whose left side can be recognized without the right side. When a Bongard Problem is left-narrow and not "right-narrow that usually makes the property on the left seem positive and the property on the right seem negative.

The OEBP by convention has preferred the "positive-seeming" property (when there is one) to be on the left side.

All in all, the keyword "notso" should mean:

1) If the Bongard Problem is "narrow" on at least one side, then it is left-narrow.

2) The right side is the conceptual negation of the left side.

If a Bongard Problem's solution is "[Property A] vs. not so", the "not so" side is everything without [Property A] within some suitable context. A Bongard Problem "triangles vs. not so" might only include simple shapes as non-triangles; it need not include images of boats as non-triangles. It is not necessary for all the kitchen sink to be thrown on the "not so" side (although it is here).

See BP1001 for a version sorting pictures of Bongard Problems (miniproblems) instead of links to pages on the OEBP. (This version is a little different. In BP1001, the kitchen sink of all other possible images is always included on the right "not so" side, rather than a context-dependent conceptual negation.)

Contrast keyword viceversa.

"[Property A] vs. not so" Bongard Problems are often allsorted, meaning they sort all relevant examples--but not always, because sometimes there exist ambiguous border cases, unclear whether they fit [Property A] or not.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP862 BP863 BP864 BP865 BP866  *  BP868 BP869 BP870 BP871 BP872

notso, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, left-self, funny

everything [smaller | same]
zoom in left

Aaron David Fairbanks