Search: author:Leo Crabbe
|
|
|
|
|
Sort:
recent
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| BP1136 |
| The removal of any one loop disentangles the whole arrangement vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1135 |
| Each component can be assigned its own layer in the arrangement vs. there is no equivalent way of dividing the arrangement into layers. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Put differently, if the examples are imagined to be arrangements of rigid sticks/hoops/etc resting on a flat surface, positive examples include sticks/hoops/etc that could be picked up without disturbing the other objects. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1130 BP1131 BP1132 BP1133 BP1134  *  BP1136 BP1137 BP1138 BP1139 BP1140
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
precise
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1133 |
| Impossible to realize in 3D space vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1132 |
| Circle that passes through points is contained within bounding box vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1131 |
| One shape can be totally obscured by the other vs. neither shape can be obscured. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1122 |
| Content of any square is an image of the whole panel vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1110 |
| The process that turns one object into the other is the same both ways vs. the process changes depending on which object is chosen as the starting point. |
|
| ?
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1109 |
| Considering only the ways they are connected, anything that can be said about a given edge can be said about every other edge vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|