Search: keyword:infinitedetail
|
Displaying 31-38 of 38 results found.
|
( prev ) page 1 2 3 4
|
|
Sort:
id
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
BP1120 |
| No same-sized copies of self overlap vs. distinct same-sized copies overlap. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1122 |
| Content of any square is an image of the whole panel vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1227 |
| Appears on its own right side vs. does not. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
This was created as an example of a Bongard Problem that could include an image of a Bongard Problem with the same solution as itself but could not include the very image of itself (appearing within itself fractally). |
|
CROSSREFS
|
See also BP961, "appears on its own left side vs. appears on its own right side".
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1222 BP1223 BP1224 BP1225 BP1226  *  BP1228 BP1229 BP1230 BP1231 BP1232
|
|
KEYWORD
|
stub, precise, allsorted, notso, handed, leftright, example, perfect, infinitedetail
|
|
CONCEPT
|
fractal (info | search), recursion (info | search)
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
|
|
|
BP1230 |
| Invariant under scaling by a certain amount vs. not. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1237 |
| Connected fractal vs. disconnected fractal. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP1238 |
| Fractal with hole vs. fractal with no hole (simply connected). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|