Search: author:Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
Sort:
recent
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
BP893 |
| As one quantity increases an equally obvious opposite quantity decreases vs. there is only one obvious quantity, which increases as the sequence progresses right. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Another way of phrasing the solution: "Neither direction would more naturally be called increase in quantity vs. rightward progression would be called an increase."
Most right examples shown are unboundedly increasing, since finite sequences showing a quantity increasing usually also suggest "distance to end of sequence" as a decreasing opposite quantity. Even so, there are some finite sequences with one direction more intuitively increase-like than the other. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP888 BP889 BP890 BP891 BP892  *  BP894 BP895 BP896 BP897 BP898
|
|
KEYWORD
|
creativeexamples, structure, rules
|
|
WORLD
|
constant_change_seq_increase_right [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
|
|
|
BP870 |
| Increasing quantity has upper bound (will get "stopped" by something) vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP859 |
| Black pixel vs. white pixel. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP855 |
| Object below ambiguously sorted (not clearly left or right) by Bongard Problem image above vs. object below clearly sorted by Bongard Problem image above. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP854 |
| Nothing vs. nothing. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP853 |
| Prime knot vs. composite knot. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP852 |
| Object shown below is the "limit" of the sequence above (end result after "infinite time") versus not so. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP851 |
| Figure with points (small white circles) can be smoothly deformed within the 2D plane without passing through itself so that all points touch to make the other figure vs. not so (movement out of the plane required). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|