Numbers of dots on the left can be obtained by repeatedly doubling 1 dot.

Numbers of dots on the left are the number of corners of a cube in some dimension.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP983 BP984 BP985 BP986 BP987  *  BP989 BP990 BP991 BP992 BP993

stub, precise, allsorted, number, left-narrow, right-null, help, preciseworld

dots [smaller | same | bigger]

Aaron David Fairbanks

On the left, each row and column could be labeled by a certain object or concept; on the right this is not so.

More specifically: on the left, each row and each column is associated with a certain object or concept; there is a rule for combining rows and columns to give images; it would be possible without changing the rule to extend with new rows/columns or delete/reorder any existing columns. On the right, this is not so; the rule might be about how the images must relate to their neighbors, for example.

All examples show grids of squares with an image in each square, such that there is some "rule" the images within the grid obey.

Left examples are a generalized version of the analogy grids seen in BP361. Any analogy a : b :: c : d shown in a 2x2 grid will fit on the left here.

To word the solution with mathematical jargon, "defines a (simply described) map from the Cartesian product of two sets vs. not so." Another equivalent solution is "columns (alternatively, rows) illustrate a consistent set of one-input operations." It is always possible to imagine the columns as inputs and the rows as operations and vice versa.

There is a trivial way in which any example can be interpreted so that it fits on the left side: imagine each row is assigned the list of all the squares in that row and each column is assigned its number, counting from the left. But each grid has a clear rule that is simpler than this.

BP1258 is a similar idea: "any square removed could be reconstructed vs. not." Examples included left here usually fit left there, but some do not e.g. EX9998.

See BP979 for use of similar structures but with one square removed from the grid.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP976 BP977 BP978 BP979 BP980  *  BP982 BP983 BP984 BP985 BP986

nice, convoluted, unwordable, notso, teach, structure, rules, grid, miniworlds

grid_of_images_with_rule [smaller | same | bigger]
zoom in left (grid_of_analogies)

Aaron David Fairbanks

All examples show grids of squares with an image in each square, such that there is some "rule" the images within the grid obey. The "rule" can be about how the images relate to their neighbors, it can involve the position of the images in the grid, and it can involve properties of the grid considered as a whole. One square from somewhere along the edge of the grid is removed.

Intentionally left out of this Problem (shown above sorted ambiguously) are cases in which the rule is not possible to deduce without seeing more squares. Due to this choice to omit those kinds of examples from the right, another acceptable solution is "it is possible to deduce the contents of the missing square once the underlying rule is understood vs. not so."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven%27s_Progressive_Matrices

BP1258 is very similar: whether ALL squares can be deduced from the rest.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP974 BP975 BP976 BP977 BP978  *  BP980 BP981 BP982 BP983 BP984

nice, notso, structure, rules, miniworlds

grid_of_images_with_rule_one_on_edge_missing [smaller | same | bigger]

Aaron David Fairbanks

An "object" is everything within some black boundary.

See BP1071 for a version with only squares and with infinite nesting allowed.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP972 BP973 BP974 BP975 BP976  *  BP978 BP979 BP980 BP981 BP982

nice, precise, allsorted, creativeexamples, traditional

Aaron David Fairbanks

A similar, but different, solution is "center of mass is above the horizontal vs. center of mass is below the horizontal."

See BP971 for the version with examples rotated a quarter-turn.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP967 BP968 BP969 BP970 BP971  *  BP973 BP974 BP975 BP976 BP977

precise, spectrum, dual, handed, updown, boundingbox, blackwhite, traditional, viceversa, absoluteposition, bordercontent

Aaron David Fairbanks

A similar, but different, solution is "center of mass is on the left half vs. center of mass is on the right half."

See BP972 for the version with examples rotated a quarter-turn.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP966 BP967 BP968 BP969 BP970  *  BP972 BP973 BP974 BP975 BP976

nice, precise, spectrum, dual, handed, leftright, rotate, boundingbox, blackwhite, traditional, viceversa, absoluteposition, bordercontent

Aaron David Fairbanks

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP965 BP966 BP967 BP968 BP969  *  BP971 BP972 BP973 BP974 BP975

stub

Aaron David Fairbanks

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP964 BP965 BP966 BP967 BP968  *  BP970 BP971 BP972 BP973 BP974

stub

Aaron David Fairbanks

See BP889 for the version in which the background doesn't count.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP961 BP962 BP963 BP964 BP965  *  BP967 BP968 BP969 BP970 BP971

nice, boundingbox, number, right-null, perfect, pixelperfect, traditional, bordercontent

Aaron David Fairbanks

Rotations are allowed. To avoid confusion about whether reflections are allowed, no examples are included on the right that require reflections to match up with themselves locally but not globally; no examples are included on the left that can match up with themselves locally but not globally using a reflection.

Only parts of ellipses are used, and only one type of ellipse per image, to make everything easier to read and reason about.

See BP1246 for a variation on this idea where instead of lining the image up with itself along arbitrarily small regions, you line the image up with itself along individual separate objects.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP960 BP961 BP962 BP963 BP964  *  BP966 BP967 BP968 BP969 BP970

hard, precise, distractingworld, perfect

Aaron David Fairbanks