Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples is clear; however, there may still be some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side (keyword "fuzzy").

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, there isn't a precise boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples is clear; however, there may be some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side (keyword "fuzzy").

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples"; however, it may still be the case that a person given any potential example would clearly be able to determine whether it fits left or right (or neither).

BPs with a precisely defined pool of examples vs. BPs with an imprecisely defined pool of examples.

"Allsorted" (left-BP509) implies "exactdivide".

"Allsorted" + "fuzzy" is equivalent to "exactdivide".

(So "exactdivide" is unnecessary. Get rid of it? Or get rid of "exact"/"fuzzy"? - Aaron David Fairbanks, Apr 15 2022)

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactdivide" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples is clear; however, there are some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, a person given any potential example would clearly be able to determine whether it fits left or right (or neither); however, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

These are finer-grained keywords to use instead of "exact". We could get rid of the keyword "exact" and in its place start using the combination of both keywords "exactworld" and "exactdivide". But it is convenient to have one keyword for "exact", since it is very common.

If there are potential border case examples that would clearly be left unsorted, the Bongard Problem can still be labelled "exactdivide".

"Allsorted" (left-BP509) implies "exactdivide".

"Allsorted" + "fuzzy" is equivalent to "exactdivide".

(So "exactdivide" is unnecessary. Remove it? - Aaron David Fairbanks, Apr 15 2022)

"Allsorted" (left-BP509) implies "exactdivide".

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactdivide" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples is clear; however, there are some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, a person given any potential example would clearly be able to determine whether it fits left or right (or neither); however, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

These are finer-grained keywords to use instead of "exact". We could get rid of the keyword "exact" and in its place start using the combination of both keywords "exactworld" and "exactdivide". But it is more convenient to have one keyword for "exact", since it is very common.

If there are potential border case examples that would clearly be left unsorted, the Bongard Problem can still be labelled "exactdivide".

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactdivide" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples is clear; however, there are some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, a person given any potential example would clearly be able to determine whether it fits left or right (or neither); however, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

These are finer-grained keywords to use instead of "exact".

If there are potential border case examples that would clearly be left unsorted, the Bongard Problem can still be labelled "exactdivide".

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactdivide" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples should be clear; however, there are some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, a person given any potential example would clearly be able to sort it; however, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

These are finer-grained keywords to use instead of "exact".

If there are potential border case examples that would clearly be left unsorted, the Bongard Problem can still be labelled "exactdivide".

Imprecisely defined BPs with a precisely defined pool of examples vs. imprecisely defined BPs with a precisely defined distinction between the two sides.

Imprecisely defined BPs with a precisely defined pool of examples vs. imprecisely defined BPs with a precisely defined division between the two sides.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "exactdivide" on the OEBP.

See keyword "exact" (left-BP508).

For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of relevant examples should be clear; however, there are some potential examples that a person might reasonably classify on either side.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, a person given any potential example would clearly be able to sort it on one of the sides; however, there isn't an exact boundary to the pool of "potential examples".

These are finer-grained keywords to use instead of "exact".

Aaron David Fairbanks