BP pages on the OEBP (with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to work out) where users should be certain (e.g. know a proof) about how examples are sorted to include them vs. users include examples on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there.

BP pages on the OEBP (with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to work out) where users are require to be certain (e.g. know a proof) about how examples are sorted to include them vs. users include examples on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "proofsrequired" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "noproofs" on the OEBP.

For every "noproofs" Bongard Problem there is a stricter "proofsrequired" version. Furthermore this stricter version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Deciding to make a Bongard Problem "noproofs" adds subjectivity to the sorting of examples (keyword "subjective" left-BP520).

In "proofsrequired" BP335 (shape tessellates the plane vs. shape does not tessellate the plane), shapes are only put in the Bongard Problem if they are known to tessellate or not to tessellate the plane. A "noproofs" version of this Bongard Problem would instead allow a shape to be put on the right if it was just (subjectively) really hard to find a way of tessellating the plane with it.

Bongard Problems (with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to work out) where examples are included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

Bongard Problems (with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to work out) where an example may be included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

Bongard Problems (with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to verify) where an example may be included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

Bongard Problems with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to verify; an example may be included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

In BP335, "shape tessellates the plane vs. shape does not tessellate the plane", shapes are only put in the Bongard Problem if they are known to tessellate or not to tessellate the plane. A "weakhardsort" version of this Bongard Problem would instead allow a shape on the right if it was just (subjectively) really hard to find a way of tessellating the plane with it.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here. Furthermore this stricter version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Deciding to make a Bongard Problem "weakhardsort" adds subjectivity to the sorting of examples (keyword "subjective" left-BP520).

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here. Furthermore this stricter version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Deciding to make a Bongard Problem "weakhardsort" adds subjectivity to the sorting of examples (see keyword "subjective" left-BP520).

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here. Furthermore this stricter version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Deciding to make a Bongard Problem "weakhardsort" adds subjectivity to the sorting of examples (see keyword "subj" %subj%).

In BP335, "shape tessellates the plane vs. shape does not tessellate the plane", examples are only included if they are proved to tessellate or not tessellate the plane. A "weakhardsort" version of this Bongard Problem would instead allow a shape on the right if it was just (subjectively) really hard to find a way of tessellating the plane with it.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here. Furthermore this stricter version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here. For a "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem, the stricitfied version will be "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Bongard Problems with a criterion for sorting that in some cases may be very difficult to strictly verify; an example may be included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

Bongard Problems with a criterion for sorting that is very difficult to strictly verify; an example may be included on a side as long as nobody has seen a reason it does not fit there vs. one must be certain (e.g. know a proof) about where examples should be sorted to include them.

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "weakhardsort" on the OEBP.

For every "weakhardsort" Bongard Problem there is a stricter version that would be sorted right here.

See keyword "hardsort" (right-BP864).

Aaron David Fairbanks