Search: keyword:rules
|
|
| Displaying 41-48 of 48 results found.
|
( prev ) page 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Sort:
id
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| BP1005 |
| The collection of dot clumps has the same numerical property as each of the dot clumps vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1006 |
| The sum of all dot clumps has the same numerical property as each of the dot clumps vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1110 |
| The process that turns one object into the other is the same both ways vs. the process changes depending on which object is chosen as the starting point. |
|
| ?
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1127 |
| There is no rule for how the objects in a cluster interrelate vs. there is. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1153 |
| Valid multi-sided Bongard Problems vs. invalid multi-sided Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1155 |
| Shapes are sorted according to a simple rule that uniquely determines where everything goes vs. shapes are sorted according to some other rule (or lack thereof). |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1157 |
| The order in which the objects in the top half are combined to make the object in the lower half matters vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1158 |
| Bongard Problems in which each example communicates a rule vs. other Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "rules" on the OEBP.
In the typical "rules" Bongard Problem, it is possible to come up with many convoluted rules that fit each example, but the intended interpretation is the only simple and obvious one.
Since it is difficult to communicate a rule with little detail, "rules" Bongard Problems are usually infodense.
Typically, each example is itself a bunch of smaller examples that all obey the rule. It is the same as how a Bongard Problems relies on many examples to communicate rules; it likely wouldn't get the answer across with just one example.
Often, each rule is communicated just by showing some examples of things satisfying it placed next to each other. (See keywords left-narrow and right-narrow.) Contrast Bongard Problems, which are more communicative, by showing some examples satisfying the rule and some examples NOT satisfying the rule.
BP1157 is an example of a "rules" Bongard Problem in which each intended rule is communicated by just one example of its application; these rules have to be particularly simple and intuitive, and the individual examples have to be complicated enough to communicate them.
A "rules" Bongard Problem is often collective. Some examples may admit multiple equally plausible rules, and the correct interpretation of each example only becomes clear once the solution is known. The group of examples together improve the solver's confidence about having understood each individual one right.
It is common that there will be one or two examples with multiple reasonable interpretations due to oversight of the author. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
All meta Bongard Problems are "rules" Bongard Problems.
Many of the other Bongard-Problem-like structures seen on the OEBP are also about recognizing a pattern. (See keyword structure.)
"Rules" Bongard Problems are abstract, although the individual rules in them may not be abstract. "Rules" Bongard Problems also usually have the keyword creativeexamples.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1153 BP1154 BP1155 BP1156 BP1157 * BP1159 BP1160 BP1161 BP1162 BP1163
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
fuzzy, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, left-self, rules
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
Welcome |
Solve |
Browse |
Lookup |
Recent |
Links |
Register |
Contact
Contribute |
Keywords |
Concepts |
Worlds |
Ambiguities |
Transformations |
Invalid Problems |
Style Guide |
Goals |
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
