login
Hints
(Greetings from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Bongard Problems!)
Search: subworld:BP1127
Displaying 1-3 of 3 results found.     page 1
     Sort: id      Format: long      Filter: (all | no meta | meta)      Mode: (words | no words)
BP854 Nothing vs. nothing.
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP849 BP850 BP851 BP852 BP853  *  BP855 BP856 BP857 BP858 BP859

KEYWORD

left-finite, right-finite, left-full, right-full, finished, experimental, funny

WORLD

nothing [same | bigger]
zoom in left (nothing) | zoom in right (nothing)

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1003 The combined collection fits the same rule as the sub-collections vs. not so.
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Since it is most intuitive to imagine spatially squishing together all the collections in the process of combining them into one big collection, avoid rules that involve relative spatial positionings of objects.

CROSSREFS

Contrast BP999, which is very similar. There, when considering the whole picture, the collections are to be treated as individual objects; here, when considering the whole picture, the collections are to be combined into one big collection. A picture showing (for example) an odd number of even-numbered groups would be sorted differently by these two BPs.

Also contrast BP1004, which is about a collection of plain objects obeying the same rule as all the objects (instead of a collection of [collections of objects] obeying the same rule as all the [collections of objects]).

See BP1006 for the version with only number-based properties. All panels in that Bongard Problem fit the same way in this Bongard Problem as well.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP998 BP999 BP1000 BP1001 BP1002  *  BP1004 BP1005 BP1006 BP1007 BP1008

KEYWORD

nice, abstract, notso, creativeexamples, rules, miniworlds

CONCEPT recursion (info | search),
self-reference (info | search)

WORLD

[smaller | same | bigger]

AUTHOR

Leo Crabbe, Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1127 There is no rule for how the objects in a cluster interrelate vs. there is.
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Other ways of phrasing this:

"Local" vs. "global" properties of collections: to check a collection satisfies a "local" property, it is only necessary to check each individual thing in it satisfies some property.

The rule all collections satisfy is just "every object is a ___" vs. the rule is something more.

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1122 BP1123 BP1124 BP1125 BP1126  *  BP1128 BP1129 BP1130 BP1131 BP1132

KEYWORD

abstract, creativeexamples, left-unknowable, rules, miniworlds

WORLD

[smaller | same | bigger]

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

    page 1

Welcome | Solve | Browse | Lookup | Recent | Links | Register | Contact
Contribute | Keywords | Concepts | Worlds | Ambiguities | Transformations | Invalid Problems | Style Guide | Goals | Glossary