login
Hints
(Greetings from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Bongard Problems!)
Search: all:new
Displaying 11-20 of 462 results found. ( prev | next )     page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 47
     Sort: recent      Format: long      Filter: (all | no meta | meta)      Mode: (words | no words)
BP1231 Bongard Problems where some information is left out from examples and they are only sorted on the side they seem to fit vs. other Bongard Problems.
BP1228
BP1229
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "seemslike" on the OEBP.


In a "seemslike" Bongard Problem, some relevant information is left out by the way objects are displayed. Solutions to "seemslike" BPs sound like "Seems like a ___ based on the information available vs. seems like a ___ based on the information available". The two sides are typically negations of one another (keyword notso).


Since there is information missing, examples can only be sorted assuming they appear in a way that hints psychologically at what they actually are (see help).

CROSSREFS

Although the rule sorting the underlying objects may be precise, the rule sorting the projections of the objects with lost information is fuzzy and subjective.


See also left-couldbe (and right-couldbe), concerning situations in which the information given may be enough to determine when examples fail to satisfy a rule but is never enough to determine when they do satisfy the rule ("could be ___ vs. clearly is not"). In contrast to "seemslike" Bongard Problems, left-couldbe Bongard Problems can be precise; both evidence of fitting right and absence of evidence of fitting right is clear-cut, so no psychologically helpful hints (help) are needed.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1226 BP1227 BP1228 BP1229 BP1230  *  BP1232 BP1233 BP1234 BP1235 BP1236

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1225 Meta Bongard Problems of the form "solution depends on other information than [property] vs. solution only depends on [property]" vs. other meta Bongard Problems.
BP575
BP895
BP1010
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "dependence" on the OEBP.


"Dependence" Bongard Problems could be considered invariance Bongard Problems, where the relevant kind of transformation is swapping the example out for any other example that shares the relevant property.

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1220 BP1221 BP1222 BP1223 BP1224  *  BP1226 BP1227 BP1228 BP1229 BP1230

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1205 Bongard Problems in which slight deformations (but perhaps across a large area) of examples can switch their sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which examples deformed slightly enough remain sorted the same way.
BP1
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Left examples have the keyword "deformunstable" on the OEBP.

Right examples have the keyword "deformstable" on the OEBP.


For the purposes of this Bongard Problem, a "slight deformation" is a way of dragging the details of an image around which is relatively uniform in any local area and moves each point at most an arbitrarily small distance. More precise definitions could be made using mathematics.


In a "deformstable" Bongard Problem, no slight deformation should outright flip an example's sorting. It is allowed for a slight deformation to make an example sorted slightly more ambiguously.

CROSSREFS

See unstable vs. stable for changing content within a small area.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1200 BP1201 BP1202 BP1203 BP1204  *  BP1206 BP1207 BP1208 BP1209 BP1210

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword, stability

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1204 Meta Bongard Problems of the form "arbitrarily small [transformation] applied to some examples switch their sorting vs. the sorting of each example is invariant under sufficiently small applications of [transformation]" vs. other meta Bongard Problems.
BP963
BP1205
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "stability" on the OEBP.


For any "stability" Bongard Problem there could usually be made a corresponding invariance Bongard Problem ("[transformation] applied to some examples switch their sorting vs. sorting is invariant under [transformation]").


Potentially, "stability" Bongard Problems could be considered invariance Bongard Problems. On one hand, they are different, since checking whether arbitrarily small transformations switch an example's sorting is different from checking whether a particular transformation switches an example's sorting; the former is infinitely many conditions. On the other hand, there is actually only finitely much detail in any of the examples, and in practice a "stability" Bongard Problem generally just amounts to "a small application of [transformation] switches an example's sorting vs. not".

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1199 BP1200 BP1201 BP1202 BP1203  *  BP1205 BP1206 BP1207 BP1208 BP1209

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1203 Bongard Problems where making a small change to some example makes it no longer fit in vs. Bongard Problems in which sufficiently small changes to examples keep them fitting in.
BP859
BP962
BP1104
BP1219
BP1
BP1220
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Left-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "unstableworld" on the OEBP.

Right-sorted Bongard Problems have the keyword "stableworld" on the OEBP.


In a "stableworld" Bongard Problem, no small change should outright make an example outright no longer fit in with the others in the Bongard Problem. It is allowed for a small change to make an example slightly less like all the others.


The meaning of "stableworld" is close to "examples have no particular format at all", but not quite the same.

CROSSREFS

See unstable vs. stable, which is about examples switching sides upon small changes instead of being rendered unsortable.

See BP1144, which is about ALL small changes to ALL examples making them unsortable.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1198 BP1199 BP1200 BP1201 BP1202  *  BP1204 BP1205 BP1206 BP1207 BP1208

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1198 Bongard Problems with images featuring dithering to simulate shades of gray vs. no gray.
BP193
BP195
BP196
BP225
BP331
BP373
BP393
BP394
BP812
BP813
BP847
BP850
BP1110
BP1175
BP1184
BP1191
BP1197
BP1224
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
BP8
BP9
BP10
BP11
BP12
BP13
BP14
BP15
BP16
BP17
BP18
BP19
BP20
BP21
BP22
BP23
BP24
BP25
BP26
BP27
BP28
BP29
BP30
BP31
BP32
BP33
BP34
BP35

. . .

(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "dithering" on the OEBP.

CROSSREFS

Bongard's original Problems never involved shades of gray. They were just black and white drawings.

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1193 BP1194 BP1195 BP1196 BP1197  *  BP1199 BP1200 BP1201 BP1202 BP1203

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1196 Bongard Problems with content touching the border of some examples vs. Bongard Problems with a lip of whitespace around the border of all examples.
BP157
BP210
BP211
BP321
BP806
BP966
BP971
BP972
BP1008
BP1014
BP1089
BP1093
BP1228
BP1230
BP1245
BP1249
BP1252
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
BP8
BP9
BP10
BP11
BP12
BP13
BP14
BP15
BP16
BP17
BP18
BP19
BP20
BP21
BP22
BP23
BP24
BP25
BP26
BP27
BP28
BP29
BP30
BP31
BP32
BP33
BP34
BP35

. . .

(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "bordercontent" on the OEBP.


All of Bongard's original Problems have whitespace around the border of all examples.

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1191 BP1192 BP1193 BP1194 BP1195  *  BP1197 BP1198 BP1199 BP1200 BP1201

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1195 Bongard Problems that depend on absolute positioning within the bounding box vs. shifting at once all content within the bounding box (without letting it cross the bounding box) will not switch the sorting of any examples.
BP8
BP209
BP243
BP257
BP312
BP818
BP971
BP972
BP1008
BP1104
BP1122
BP1132
BP1156
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
BP9
BP10
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "absoluteposition" on the OEBP.


The repositioned content has to stay within the box. If an example in a Bongard Problem features content touching a border (keyword bordercontent), then that prevents the contents from being shifted in that direction.

CROSSREFS

If a Bongard Problem has the keyword "absoluteposition", then it likely has the keyword boundingbox.

If a Bongard Problem has the keyword boundingbox and does not have the keyword bordercontent, then it likely has the keyword "absoluteposition".

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1190 BP1191 BP1192 BP1193 BP1194  *  BP1196 BP1197 BP1198 BP1199 BP1200

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword, invariance

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1194 Bongard Problems listed in Harry E. Foundalis's collection vs. not.
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
BP8
BP9
BP10
BP11
BP12
BP13
BP14
BP15
BP16
BP17
BP18
BP19
BP20
BP21
BP22
BP23
BP24
BP25
BP26
BP27
BP28
BP29
BP30
BP31
BP32
BP33
BP34
BP35

. . .

BP501
BP503
BP504
BP505
BP506
BP507
BP508
BP509
BP510
BP1194
(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Alternatively, BP pages on the OEBP with number less than or equal to 394 vs. other BP pages.

REFERENCE

https://www.foundalis.com/res/bps/bpidx.htm

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1189 BP1190 BP1191 BP1192 BP1193  *  BP1195 BP1196 BP1197 BP1198 BP1199

EXAMPLE

Foundalis's collection includes all Bongard Problems by Bongard.

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, right-self, time

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

BP1190 BPs with a precisely defined pool of examples vs. BPs with an imprecisely defined pool of examples.
BP3
BP6
BP13
BP103
BP292
BP312
BP329
BP334
BP376
BP384
BP386
BP390
BP391
BP557
BP558
BP560
BP569
BP576
BP788
BP856
BP891
BP897
BP898
BP905
BP922
BP932
BP942
BP945
BP949
BP956
BP961
BP962
BP988
BP989
BP993

. . .

(edit; present; nest [left/right]; search; history)
COMMENTS

Left-sorted Bongard Problems are tagged with the keyword "preciseworld" on the OEBP.


The keyword "preciseworld" basically means: if a new Bongard Problem were created to sort whether or not examples fit in the pool of examples in the original Bongard Problem, it would be tagged precise.


For a Bongard Problem fitting left, the intended class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem is clear-cut.

For a Bongard Problem fitting right, there isn't any obvious boundary to take as delimiting the pool of potential examples. There is an imprecise fading of relevancy rather than a natural cutoff point.



Sometimes there are specific notable cases of potential examples for which there is ambiguity about whether they belong.


For example, the empty square (zero dots) has been left out of BP989. This is perhaps the only obvious example that is ambiguous as to whether it should be considered as belonging to the pool of examples shown in the Bongard Problem (or any similar dot-counting Bongard Problem).

(There would be no ambiguity if it were actually included in the Bongard Problem.)

(Whether or not zero seems like an obvious example also has a cultural component (see culture); someone who is not accustomed think of zero as a number might not see this as ambiguous at all.)

Larger pools of examples make the absence of notable border cases like this more conspicuous and intentional-seeming. (See also discussion at left-narrow.) But expanding the pool of examples cannot resolve certain border cases: if the rule of the Bongard Problem by nature leaves unsorted a potential example that is a border case for even fitting in with the rest of the examples, its absence doesn't communicate anything; whether it belongs with the pool of examples remains ambiguous.



It is tempting to make another another "allsortedworld" analogous to allsorted. But the pool of relevant examples fitting in a Bongard Problem is like a Bongard Problem with only one side: a collection satisfying some rule. Would there be any difference between precise and allsorted for a Bongard Problem with only one side?

CROSSREFS

Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP1185 BP1186 BP1187 BP1188 BP1189  *  BP1191 BP1192 BP1193 BP1194 BP1195

EXAMPLE

Bongard Problems featuring generic shapes ( https://oebp.org/search.php?q=world:fill_shape ) have not usually been labelled "preciseworld". (What counts as a "shape"? Can the shapes be fractally complicated, for example? What exactly are the criteria?) Nonetheless, these Bongard Problems are frequently precise.

KEYWORD

meta (see left/right), links, keyword

AUTHOR

Aaron David Fairbanks

( prev | next )     page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 47

Welcome | Solve | Browse | Lookup | Recent | Links | Register | Contact
Contribute | Keywords | Concepts | Worlds | Ambiguities | Transformations | Invalid Problems | Style Guide | Goals | Glossary