Search: ex:BP359
|
|
| Displaying 1-9 of 9 results found.
|
page 1
|
|
|
Sort:
id
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| BP503 |
| "Nice" Bongard Problems vs. Bongard Problems the OEBP does not need more like. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP514 |
| Bongard Problems whose right examples could stand alone vs. the left side is necessary to communicate what the right side is. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP550 |
| Experimental Bongard Problems vs. traditional-style Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "experimental" on the OEBP.
Right examples have the keyword "traditional" on the OEBP.
Experimental BPs push the boundaries of what makes Bongard Problems Bongard Problems.
Traditional BPs show some simple property of black and white pictures. The OEBP is a place with many wild and absurd Bongard Problems, so it is useful to have an easy way to just find the regular old Bongard Problems. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP545 BP546 BP547 BP548 BP549 * BP551 BP552 BP553 BP554 BP555
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
subjective, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, left-it
|
|
|
WORLD
|
bp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP556 |
| Visual Bongard Problems such that if black and white are switched some examples switch sides vs. visual Bongard Problems that would always sort two switched versions the same way. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP678 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: pattern / randomness vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP837 |
| Bongard Problems in which individual examples may be unclearly sorted (it may be arguable which side they should go on) but many examples together are still able to communicate the solution vs. other Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "collective" on the OEBP.
Some Bongard Problems are "collective" in a more extreme way than others. Perhaps there are absolutely no individual examples that anyone would confidently sort on either side, and the solver can only be expected to get a vague gist by seeing them all together. Or perhaps in practice most people agree about where most examples should fit, even though a stretch of an argument could conceivably be made for each one fitting on the other side.
In some collective Bongard Problems, each example admits a number of possible interpretations, and the correct choice of interpretation is only clear once the solution is known. The group of examples together improve the solver's confidence about having understood each individual one right. This is common in rules Bongard Problems), where each example communicates its own rule.
Collective Bongard Problems are borderline invalid Bongard Problems (see https://www.oebp.org/invalid.php ). There is no one rule dividing the sides; the solution is not a method to determine whether an arbitrary example fits left or right. It is a less strict kind of Bongard Problem. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Collective implies fuzzy.
Collective Bongard Problems are often abstract".
Subjective Bongard Problems are often collective.
In some Bongard Problems, each example has a corresponding slightly different twin example on the other side (keyword contributepairs), and it is necessary to see both examples together in order to be able to sort either of them. This is related to "collective" but not quite the same. It becomes unambiguous where an example fits once its twin is seen.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP832 BP833 BP834 BP835 BP836 * BP838 BP839 BP840 BP841 BP842
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
meta (see left/right), links, keyword
|
|
|
WORLD
|
bp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1165 |
| Visual Bongard Problems where all possible sorted examples share a specific black region vs. not so. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
