The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to change this.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: EX8220 "all are 'all are ___' " and EX8222 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with other grouping numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: EX8220 "all are 'all are ___' " and EX8222 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with other grouping numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: EX8220 "all are 'all are ___' " and EX8219 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with other grouping numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: "all are 'all are ___'" and EX8219 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with other grouping numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: "all are 'all are ___'" and EX8218 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Examples in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some examples if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with groups of numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: "all are 'all are ___'" and EX8218 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some squares if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with groups of numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow the same pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: "all are 'all are ___'" and EX8218 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some squares if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with groups of numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Currently, in none of the uploaded left examples do all the groups shown follow a pattern, so a valid alternative solution is "not all groups share some obvious property vs. all do." This is because the relevant group-property usually has to do with not all objects in it satisfying a certain property, and thus not all groups can satisfy that group-property. Some group-properties would allow the whole group to be the same, but these tend to be hard to parse. Indeed, shown sorted ambiguously above are some examples that would fit left interpreted as follows: "all are 'all are ___'" and EX8218 "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. It may confuse the message to include any examples like these on the left side.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some squares if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. (These numbers are unimportant; feel free to add other examples with groups of numbers and change this description.) The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all shown groups satisfy the same property. (A valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") This is because the relevant property usually has to do with not all objects in the group satisfying a certain property. Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property (e.g. blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject). However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

This Problem is a "correspondence" (left-BP919) Problem. Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. It may be very hard to interpret some squares if this Problem isn't presented helpfully (in a symmetrical format with corresponding squares opposite one another).

All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all shown groups satisfy the same property. (A valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") This is because the relevant property usually has to do with not all objects in the group satisfying a certain property. Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property (e.g. blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject). However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all shown groups satisfy the same property. (A valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") This is because the relevant property usually has to do with not all objects in the group satisfying a certain property. Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property (e.g. blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject). However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all shown groups satisfy the same property. (Therefore, a valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") This is because the relevant property usually has to do with not all objects in the group satisfying a certain property. Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property (e.g. blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject). However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to make. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all shown groups satisfy the same property. (Therefore, a valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") This is because the relevant property usually has to do with not all objects in the group satisfying a certain property. Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property (e.g. blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject-whiteobject-blackobject). However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all groups satisfy the same property. (Therefore, a valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that all groups satisfy the same property. (Therefore, a valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") Here are some potential left examples such that all groups do share the relevant property: "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

So far, no left examples have been uploaded such that every small group satisfies the same property. (Therefore, a valid alternative solution for the examples currently uploaded is "not all groups have the same property vs. all do.") Potential left examples such that all groups share the property include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome with respect to some property. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message to include any left examples like these.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020