Revision history for BP974
|
Displaying 1-25 of 43 results found.
|
page 1 2
|
|
Edits shown per page: 25.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword @absoluteposition, then it likely has the keyword @boundingbox.
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword @boundingbox and does not have the keyword @bordercontent, then it likely has the keyword @absoluteposition. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword @absoluteposition.)
Expanding the boxes of BP2 ("big vs. small") makes the contents smaller in comparison to the box, but not smaller in an absolute sense. Hence the situation is ambiguous. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword @absoluteposition, then it likely has the keyword @boundingbox.
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword @boundingbox and does not have the keyword @bordercontent (right-BP1196), then it likely has the keyword @absoluteposition. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword "absoluteposition" (left-BP1195), then it likely has the keyword "boundingbox".
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword "boundingbox" and does not have the keyword "bordercontent" (right-BP1196), then it likely has the keyword "absoluteposition" (left-BP1195). |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword "absoluteposition" (left-BP1195), then it likely has the keyword "boundingbox".
If a Bongard Problem has the keyword "boundingbox" and does not have the keyword "bordercontent" (right-BP1196), then it likely has the keyword "absoluteposition" (left-BP1195). |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword "absoluteposition" left-BP1195.)
Expanding the boxes of BP2 ("big vs. small") makes the contents smaller in comparison to the box, but not smaller in an absolute sense. Hence the situation is ambiguous. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword "absoluteposition" left-BP1195.)
Expanding the boxes of BP2 ("big vs. small") makes the contents smaller in comparison to the box, but not absolutely smaller. Hence the situation is ambiguous. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword "absoluteposition" left-BP1195.)
Expanding the boxes of BP2 ("big vs. small") makes the contents smaller in comparison to the box, but not absolutely smaller. Hence the situation is unclear. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword "absoluteposition" left-BP1195.) |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box. (See keyword "position" left-BP1195.) |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Bongard Problems with content touching the border of some examples are tagged with the keyword "bordercontent" (left-BP1196). |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "boundingbox" on the OEBP.
Slightly different: sliding the content in a box around without letting it cross the bounding box and without changing the size of the bounding box.
We could make another version using that criterion instead (but it would sort most BPs the same way). |
|
|
|