If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely "exact" (left-BP508): it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies "continuous" (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it is a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, consider it a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Bongard Problems such that making repeated small changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples while staying within the class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem (there is no middle-ground between the sides or there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of).

Bongard Problems such that making repeated small successive changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples while staying within the class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem (there is no middle-ground between the sides or there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of).

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely "exact" (left-BP508): if Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that are sorted by the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies "continuous" (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely "exact" (left-BP508): if Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that are sorted by the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies "continuous" (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions of detail.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra are borderline cases.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum, consider it a gap, since that means the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely "exact" (left-BP508): if Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that are sorted by the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies "continuous" (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions of detail instead of gradual change.

Bongard Problems such that making repeated small successive changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples while staying within the class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem (there is no middle-ground between the sides and there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of).

Bongard Problems such that making repeated small successive changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples (there is no middle-ground between the sides and there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of).

If Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that are sorted by the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits (keyword "exact" left-BP508).

"Gap" implies "continuous" (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions of detail instead of gradual change.

If Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that are sorted by the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits (keyword "exact" left-BP508).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions of detail instead of gradual change.

If Bongard Problem has a "gap", and there is a clear boundary to the total collection of examples that should fit in the Bongard Problem, it will likely furthermore be clear on which side any potential example fits (keyword "exact" left-BP508).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions of detail instead of gradual change.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

What "small continuous change" means depends on the context. This is subjective. In BP6, adding a corner seems an abrupt change, even though it would only require altering a relatively small selection of pixels. It is a discrete change in the class of object someone sees.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra are borderline cases.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum, consider it a gap, since that means the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

What "small continuous change" means depends on the context. This is subjective. In BP6, adding a corner seems an abrupt change, even though it would only require altering a relatively small selection of pixels. It is a change in the class of object someone sees.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra are borderline cases.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum, consider it a gap, since that means the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

What "small continuous change" means depends on the context. This is subjective. In BP6, adding a corner seems an abrupt change, even though it would only require altering a relatively small selection of pixels. A change in the class of object someone sees is not here considered a small change.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra are borderline cases.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum, consider it a gap, since that means the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

What "small continuous change" means depends on the context. This is subjective. In BP6, adding a corner seems an abrupt change, even though it would only require altering a relatively small selection of pixels. A change in the class of object someone sees is not here considered a small change.

Contrast "allsorted" (left-BP509).

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword "spectrum" BP507) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra are borderline cases.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum, consider it a gap, since that means the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary (left-BP950) when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.