This is a very @fuzzy definition. Some left examples arguably should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary--the Platonic solids EX6730 and primes EX6734 especially, as these show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed one cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Bongard Problem has been solved by people.

This is a very inexact definition. Some left examples arguably should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary--the Platonic solids EX6730 and primes EX6734 especially, as these show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed one cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Bongard Problem has been solved by people.

Representations of natural mathematical objects vs. representations of arbitrary objects.

This is a very inexact Problem definition. Some left examples arguably should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary--the Platonic solids EX6730 and primes EX6734 especially, as these show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed one cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Problem has been solved by people.

This is a very inexact Problem definition. It may be argued that some left examples should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary; the Platonic solids EX6730 and primes EX6734 especially show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed one cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Problem has been solved by people.

This is a very inexact Problem definition. It may be argued that some left examples should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary; the Platonic solids EX6730 and primes EX6734 especially show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed we cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Problem has been solved by people.

This is a very inexact Problem definition. It may be argued that some left examples should be placed on the right, since the particular way they are represented is arbitrary; the Platonic solids EX6730 and EX6734 especially show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed we cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Problem has been solved by people.

This is a very inexact Problem definition. It may be argued that right examples should be placed on the right, since their particular way they are represented isn't arbitrary; the Platonic solids EX6730 and EX6734 especially show arbitrary placement and arrangement of objects. Furthermore if arbitrary representations are allowed we cannot be sure for example the right hand drawing of random numbers EX6740 does not represent "numbers" in general. Still this Problem has been solved by people.

Representations of canonical mathematical objects vs. representations of arbitrary objects.

Aaron David Fairbanks

Bongard Problems with "world" outline of shape (as described in BP529) that must be elongated vs. other Bongard Problems.

This is a specific parsing of the world. It is possible the world would instead be parsed as BP529. BP pages listing this as their world may list that world also as an alternative option.

Bongard Problems with "world" outline of shape as described in BP529 that is elongated vs. other Bongard Problems.

Aaron David Fairbanks