Another solution is "evokes infinity vs. not so." Or "seen as having arbitrarily fine detail." All left examples show objects getting smaller and smaller and closer and closer together approaching some limit within the box.

Image depicting infinitely many objects vs. image depicting finitely many objects.

Another solution is "evokes infinity vs. not so." Or "parsed as having arbitrarily fine detail." All left examples show objects getting smaller and smaller and closer and closer together approaching some limit within the box.

Another solution is "evokes infinity." Or "parsed as having arbitrarily fine detail." All left examples show objects getting smaller and smaller and closer and closer together approaching some limit within the box.

Or "parsed as having arbitrarily fine detail." All left examples show objects getting smaller and smaller and closer and closer together approaching some limit within the box.

Or "parsed as having arbitrarily fine detail." All left examples show objects getting smaller and smaller and closer together approaching some limit within the box.

Or "parsed as having arbitrarily fine detail."

Or "parsed with arbitrarily fine detail."

Image depicting infinitely many objects vs. image depicting finitely many objects

Equivalently "parsed with infinitely fine detail."

Aaron David Fairbanks

By "standard form" it is meant that there is a thin black line with examples in black-outlined bounding boxes on either side and there is an overall white/blank background.

Image of Bongard Problem (standard form) vs. anything else.

Bongard Problems (using specific examples).

Aaron David Fairbanks

These are Bongard Problems in a loose sense: any image that shows two separate collections counts.

Images of Bongard Problems vs. anything else.

Bongard Problem incarnations (using specific examples) vs. anything else.

Bongard Problems (using specific examples) vs. anything else.