Revision history for BP508
|
Displaying 376-394 of 394 results found.
|
page 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16
|
|
Edits shown per page: 25.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Precise Bongard Problems.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems that with precise definitions. For quantity-based BPs, this means it is possible to calculate precisely the values of the examples.
This is the keyword "precise" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "exact" on the OEBP.
In exact Bongard Problems, it is always clear where each relevant example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed, but only if it is clear precisely which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
For Bongard Problems based on images we assume the pure intented geometry represented by the image is magically understood by us before we sort. The case of a "poorly drawn square" is not here considered an ambiguous case for BP6 triangles vs. squares.
However, for Bongard Problems specifically about approximation, e.g. BP10 approximately triangular outline vs. approximately convex quadrilateral outline, even in the pure geometry there is a spectrum of how closely a shape approximates a quadrilateral; there are ambiguous cases here. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "exact" on the OEBP.
In exact Bongard Problems, it is always clear where each relevant example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed, but only if it is clear precisely which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
For Bongard Problems based on images we assume the pure intented geometry represented by the image is magically understood by us before we sort. The case of a "poorly drawn square" is not here considered an ambiguous case for triangles vs. squares.
However, for Bongard Problems specifically about approximation, e.g. BP10 "Approximately triangular outline vs. approximately convex quadrilateral outline," even in the pure geometry there is a spectrum of closely approximating a quadrilateral; there are ambiguous cases. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "exact" on the OEBP.
In exact Bongard Problems, it is always clear where each relevant example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed, but only if it is clear precisely which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough). |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting vs. Bongard Problems with vagueness in definition.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting vs. Bongard Problems with vague definition.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP508 |
| on 2020-06-28 19:59:54 approved |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting vs. Bongard Problems with unclear definition.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting vs. Bongard Problems where the definition is not as clear.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
This is the keyword "exact" on the OEBP.
In exact Bongard Problems, it is always clear where each relevant example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed, but only if it is clear precisely which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough). |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Exact Bongard Problems vs. inexact Bongard Problems.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting versus Bongard Problems where the definition is not as clear.
It is always clear where each example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed, but only if it is clear exactly which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
This is the keyword "exact" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting.
It is always clear where each example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed only if it is clear exactly which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
This is the keyword "exact" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Exact Bongard Problems.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with exact sorting.
It is always clear where each example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed only if it is clear exactly which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
This is the keyword "precise" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with precise sorting.
It is always clear where each example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed only if it is clear exactly which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this usually means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
This is the keyword "precise" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with precise sorting.
It is always clear where each example should be sorted. Ambiguity is allowed only if it is clear exactly which cases are ambiguous.
For quantity-based BPs, this means it is possible to calculate exactly the values of the examples (when the examples are themselves specified exactly enough).
This is the keyword "precise" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems with precise definitions. For quantity-based BPs, this means it is possible to calculate precisely the values of the examples.
This is the keyword "precise" on the OEBP. |
|
EXAMPLE
|
|
|
|
|