Revision history for BP1135
|
Displaying 1-8 of 8 results found.
|
page 1
|
|
Edits shown per page: 25.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Each component can be assigned its own layer in the arrangement vs. there is no equivalent way of dividing the arrangement into layers.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
Each component can be assigned its own layer in the arrangement vs. there is no such way of dividing the arrangement into layers.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Put differently, if the examples are imagined to be arrangements of rigid sticks/hoops/etc resting on a flat surface, positive examples include sticks/hoops/etc that could be picked up without disturbing the other objects. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Put differently, if the examples are imagined to be arrangements of rigid sticks/hoops/etc resting on a flat surface, positive examples include sticks/hoops/etc that could be 'picked up' without disturbing the other objects. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
There is a "top layer" vs. not so.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NAME
|
There is a component that rests on top of other components vs. not so.
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Put differently, if the examples are imagined to be collections of rigid sticks/hoops/etc resting on a flat surface, positive examples include sticks/hoops/etc that could be 'picked up' without disturbing the other objects. |
|
AUTHOR
|
Leo Crabbe |
|
|
|
|
|
+DATA
|
EX9347 EX9345 EX9348 |
|
|
|
|
|
-DATA
|
EX9344 EX9349 EX9350 |
|
|
|