Search: ex:BP1122
|
Displaying 1-10 of 12 results found.
|
( next ) page 1 2
|
|
Sort:
id
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
BP503 |
| "Nice" Bongard Problems vs. Bongard Problems the OEBP does not need more like. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP511 |
| Noisy Bongard Problems vs. minimalist Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left-sorted BPs have the keyword "noisy" on the OEBP. Right-sorted examples have the keyword "minimal."
Noisy Bongard Problems include extra details varying between examples that distract from the solution property; more specifically noise is properties independent of the solution property that vary between examples. Minimalist Bongard Problems only vary details absolutely necessary to communicate the solution.
"Noisy" is different than the kind of distraction mentioned at distractingworld, which means the class of examples is distractingly specific, irrelevant to the solution, rather than that there are extra distracting properties changing between examples.
Bongard Problems have varying degrees of noisiness. Only include here BPs that are very noisy or very minimal. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
See BP827 for the version with pictures of Bongard Problems (miniproblems) instead of links to pages on the OEBP.
See BP845 for noise in sequences of quantity increase.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP506 BP507 BP508 BP509 BP510  *  BP512 BP513 BP514 BP515 BP516
|
|
KEYWORD
|
fuzzy, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, sideless
|
|
WORLD
|
bp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Harry E. Foundalis, Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
|
|
|
BP535 |
| Visual Bongard Problems such that flipping over the vertical axis (left/right) can switch an example's side vs. visual Bongard Problems whose examples' sorting doesn't change under such a transformation. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP553 |
| Rotation-dependent Bongard Problems vs. rotation-independent visual Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP554 |
| Size-dependent Bongard Problems vs. size-independent visual Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP638 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: fractal vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP687 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: recursion vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP691 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: self-reference vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BP958 |
| Visual Bongard Problems about examples being read with infinite detail vs. other visual Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Left examples have the keyword "infinitedetail" on the OEBP.
Image files on the OEBP do not really have infinite detail. For a panel to be intuitively read as having infinite detail, there usually needs to be some apparent self-similarity, or perhaps a sequence of objects following an easy to read pattern getting smaller and smaller with increasing pixelation.
Usually in "infinitedetail" Bongard Problems, not only is it a puzzle to figure out the solution, but it is another puzzle to find self-similarities and understand the intended infinite detail in each example. |
|
CROSSREFS
|
BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword perfect, but should not be tagged with the keyword pixelperfect.
Just because a Bongard Problem has "infinitedetail" does not necessarily make it infodense. Some fractal images might be encoded by a small amount of information (just the information about which places within itself it includes smaller copies of itself) and may be recognized quickly.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP953 BP954 BP955 BP956 BP957  *  BP959 BP960 BP961 BP962 BP963
|
|
KEYWORD
|
notso, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, wellfounded
|
|
WORLD
|
visualbp [smaller | same | bigger]
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
|
|
|
|
BP974 |
| "Bounding-box-dependent" Bongard Problems vs. Bongard Problems in which the bounding box can be extended arbitrarily in any direction (in white space) without switching the sorting of any examples. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
Solve |
Browse |
Lookup |
Recent |
Links |
Register |
Contact
Contribute |
Keywords |
Concepts |
Worlds |
Ambiguities |
Transformations |
Invalid Problems |
Style Guide |
Goals |
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|