BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword @perfect, but should not be tagged with the keyword @pixelperfect.

Just because a Bongard Problem has "infinitedetail" does not necessarily make it @infodense. Some fractal images might be encoded by a small amount of information (just the information about which places within itself it includes smaller copies of itself) and may be recognized quickly.

BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword @perfect, but should not be tagged with the keyword @pixelperfect.

Just because a Bongard Problem has "infinitedetail" does not necessarily make it "@infodense. Some fractal images might be encoded by a small amount of information (just the information about which places within itself it includes smaller copies of itself) and may be recognized quickly.

BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword "perfect" (left-BP913), but should not be tagged with the keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

Just because a Bongard Problem has "infinitedetail" does not necessarily make it "infodense" (left-BP978). Some fractal images might be encoded by a small amount of information (just the information of which places within itself it includes smaller copies of itself) and may be recognized quickly.

Left examples have the keyword "infinitedetail" on the OEBP.

Image files on the OEBP do not really have infinite detail. For a panel to be intuitively read as having infinite detail, there usually needs to be some apparent self-similarity, or perhaps a sequence of objects following an easy to read pattern getting smaller and smaller with increasing pixelation.

Usually in "infinitedetail" Bongard Problems, not only is it a puzzle to figure out the solution, but it is another puzzle to find self-similarities and understand the intended infinite detail in each example.

Visual Bongard Problems about examples being read with infinite detail vs. other visual Bongard Problems.

Left examples have the keyword "infinitedetail" on the OEBP.

Image files on the OEBP do not really have infinite detail. For a panel to be intuitively read as having infinite detail, there usually needs to be some apparent self-similarity, or perhaps a sequence of objects following an easy to read pattern getting smaller and smaller with increasing pixelation.

Usually in "infinitedetail" Bongard Problems, not only is the puzzle to figure out the solution, but it is another puzzle to find self-similarities and understand the intended infinite detail in each example.

BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" (left-BP913), but should not be tagged with the keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

Just because a Bongard Problem has "infinitedetail" does not necessarily make it "infodense" (left-BP978). Some fractal images might be encoded by a small amount of information (just the information of which places within itself it includes smaller copies of itself) and may be recognized quickly.

Left examples have the keyword "infinitedetail" on the OEBP.

Image files on the OEBP do not really have infinite detail. For a panel to be intuitively parsed with infinite detail, there usually needs to be some apparent self-similarity, or perhaps a sequence of objects following an easy to parse pattern getting smaller and smaller with increasing pixelation.

Usually in "infinitedetail" Bongard Problems, not only is the puzzle to figure out the solution, but it is another puzzle to find self-similarities and understand the intended infinite detail in each example.

BPs tagged with the keyword "infinitedetail" usually feature pixelated images that give the closest approximation of the intended infinite structure up to pixelation. This means they should be tagged with the keyword "imperfectionscanmatter" (left-BP913), but should not be tagged with the keyword "pixelperfect" (left-BP947).

BPs tagged with "infinitedetail" are usually also tagged with "imperfectionscanmatter" (left-BP913).

Left examples have the keyword "infinitedetail" on the OEBP.

Image files on the OEBP do not really have infinite detail. For a panel to be intuitively parsed with infinite detail, there usually needs to be some apparent self-similarity, or perhaps a sequence of objects following an easy to parse pattern getting smaller and smaller with increasing pixelation.