Search: +ex:BP9
|
|
| Displaying 1-8 of 8 results found.
|
page 1
|
|
|
Sort:
id
Format:
long
Filter:
(all | no meta | meta)
Mode:
(words | no words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| BP501 |
| Easy Bongard Problems vs. hard Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP503 |
| "Nice" Bongard Problems vs. Bongard Problems the OEBP does not need more like. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP546 |
| BPs with sides commonly used as the entire set of examples for other BPs on the OEBP vs. other BP pages. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP761 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: texture of line or curve vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP763 |
| Bongard Problem with solution relating to concept: texture vs. Bongard Problem unrelated to this concept. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP798 |
| Bongard Problems by Bongard vs. other Bongard Problems. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP964 |
| Bongard Problems such that making repeated small changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples while staying within the class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem (there is no middle-ground between the sides; there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of). |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.
A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.
For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.
Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)
Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated. |
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.
"Gap" implies stable. (This technically includes cases in which ALL small changes make certain examples no longer fit in with the Bongard Problem, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. See also BP1144.)
See also preciseworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems would be tagged "preciseworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.
See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.
Adjacent-numbered pages:
BP959 BP960 BP961 BP962 BP963 * BP965 BP966 BP967 BP968 BP969
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
unwordable, meta (see left/right), links, keyword, sideless, invariance
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Aaron David Fairbanks
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| BP1194 |
| Bongard Problems listed in Harry E. Foundalis's collection vs. not. |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
Welcome |
Solve |
Browse |
Lookup |
Recent |
Links |
Register |
Contact
Contribute |
Keywords |
Concepts |
Worlds |
Ambiguities |
Transformations |
Invalid Problems |
Style Guide |
Goals |
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
