If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @stable. (This technically includes cases in which ALL small changes make certain examples no longer fit in with the Bongard Problem, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. See also BP1144.)

See also @preciseworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems would be tagged "preciseworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @stable. (This technically includes cases in which ALL small changes make certain examples no longer fit in with the Bongard Problem, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. See also BP1144.)

See also @preciseworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems should be tagged "preciseworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a @spectrum should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a @spectrum should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

For the purpose of this Bongard Problem, "small change" means adding to or removing from an arbitrarily small portion of the image. More general kinds of small change could be explored, such as translating or deforming the whole image slightly, or even context-dependent small-changes, but they are not considered here.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

For the purpose of this Bongard Problem, "small change" means adding to or removing from an arbitrarily small portion of the image. More general kinds of small change could be explored, such as translating or deforming the whole image slightly, or even context-dependent small-changes, but they are not considered here.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a @spectrum should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @stableincontext. (This includes cases in which ALL small changes render certain examples unsortable, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. See BP1144.)

See also @preciseworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems should be tagged "preciseworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" (technically) implies @stable. (However, in practice it has seemed unnatural to tag BPs "stable" when all small changes render certain examples unsortable, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. Cf. BP1144.)

See also @preciseworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems should be tagged "preciseworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @precise: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" (technically) implies @stable. (However, in practice it has seemed unnatural to tag BPs "stable" when all small changes render certain examples unsortable, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. Cf. BP1144.)

See also @exactworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems should be "exactworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a @spectrum should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @exact: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" (technically) implies @stable. (However, in practice it has seemed unnatural to tag BPs "stable" when all small changes render certain examples unsortable, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. Cf. BP1144.)

See also @exactworld. "Gap" Bongard Problems should be "exactworld" when the two classes of objects are each clear; it is then apparent that there is no larger shared context and that no other types of objects besides the two types would be sorted by the Bongard Problem.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of partially filled black-and-white images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword @spectrum) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Bongard Problems such that making repeated small changes can switch an example's sorting vs. Bongard Problems in which the two sides are so different that it is impossible to cross the gap by making successive small changes to examples while staying within the class of examples sorted by the Bongard Problem (there is no middle-ground between the sides; there is no obvious choice of shared ambient context both sides are part of).

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @exact: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" (technically) implies @stable. (However, in practice it has seemed unnatural to tag BPs "stable" when all small changes render certain examples unsortable, as is sometimes the case in "gap" BPs. Cf. BP1144.)

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword @spectrum) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast @allsorted.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword @spectrum) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. (However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it could be a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.)

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast @allsorted.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword @spectrum) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (@Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it is a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @exact: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @stable.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @exact: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @continuous.

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.

Right-sorted BPs have the keyword "gap" on the OEBP.

A Bongard Problem with a gap showcases two completely separate classes of objects.

For example, the Bongard Problem "white vs. black" (BP962) has a gap; there is no obvious choice of shared context between the two sides. One could imagine there is a spectrum of grays between them, or that there is a space of black-and-white bitmap images between them, or any number of other ambient contexts.

Contrast @allsorted.

Bongard Problems about comparing quantities on a spectrum (keyword @spectrum) should not usually be considered "gap" BPs. (Discrete spectra perhaps.) A spectrum establishes a shared context, with examples on both sides of the BP landing somewhere on it. However, if it is reasonable to imagine getting the solution without noticing a spectrum in between, it is a gap, since the ambient context is unclear.

Bongard Problems with gaps may seem particularly @arbitrary when the two classes of objects are particularly unrelated.

If a Bongard Problem has a "gap" it is likely @exact: it will likely be clear on which side any potential example fits.

"Gap" implies @continuous (right-BP963).

See BP1140, which is about any (perhaps large) additions instead of repeated small changes.