The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five objects. The objects in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version. All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta: "meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts; "doubly-meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version.

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

Roughly speaking, right examples are meta while left examples are doubly-meta.

"Meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts. "Doubly meta" is when the whole group imitates its parts with respect to the way it imitates its parts.

Example ideas to be included in this Problem should ideally admit both a doubly-meta version and a singly-meta version.

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property that depends on other properties: "X with respect to __[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property depending on other properties: "X with respect to _[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Please add and sign any more ideas you have.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Each example showcases some property depending on other properties: "X with respect to _[property]__".

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

Below is a list of left example ideas that would be impossible to execute. Feel free to add new ideas and sign them.

"Exhaustive list of all exhaustive lists of all ____". - Aaron David Fairbanks, Nov 23 2020

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

Right examples are such that each small group satisfies the special property that the whole group satisfies. So far no left examples have been uploaded such that each small group satisfies the special property. Potential left examples like that include "all are 'all are ___'" and "palindrome with respect to being a palindrome with respect to ___", where every example is a palindrome. However, these particular examples are probably hard to parse, and it may confuse the message in general to include such left examples.

X "X ___" vs. each group satisfies "X ___" and the whole collection of groups does as well for some unrelated reason.

The right side of this Problem is a subset of left-BP999.

The right side of this Problem is a subset of left-BP999. It seems there may be no left examples of this Problem that fit on right-BP999, so BP999's solution (flipped) may work as an alternative solution for this Problem.

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" and all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

X "X ___" vs. each group satisfies "X ___" and the whole collection of groups does as well.

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: of the groups in one of the left boxes, all but one are "all but one are ___". Of the groups in the corresponding right box, all are "all but one are ___" while all but one are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

X "X ___" vs. each satisfies "X ___" and the whole does as well.

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: in one of the left boxes, all but one groups are "all but one are ___", and in the corresponding right box all groups are "all but one are ___" while all but one of these groups are black.

Other left examples include "every other is 'every other is ___' " and "gradually getting more like 'gradually getting more like ___' ".

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

[determiner X] are "[determiner X] are ___" vs. each is "[determiner X] are ___" and the whole is as well.

[determiner X] are "[determiner X] are ___" vs. all are "[determiner X] are ___" and the whole is as well.

The right side of this Problem is a subset of left-BP999. It seems there may be no left examples of this Problem that fit on right-BP999, so BP999's solution may work as an alternative solution for this Problem.

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: in one of the left boxes, all but one groups are "all but one are ___", and in the corresponding right box all groups are "all but one are ___" while all but one of these groups are black.

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.

The above description of the answer is not very helpful, so here is an example: in one of the left boxes, all but one groups are "all but one are ___", and in the corresponding right box all groups are "all but one are ___" and, in the whole collection of these groups, all but one are black.

All examples show five groups of five things. The things in each group are aligned horizontally and the groups are stacked on top of one another vertically.