Left examples have keyword "distractingworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned at @noisy, which means there are details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "distractingworld" is to judge that the type of examples are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas the BP really ought to have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Distractingworld BPs are often @arbitrary.

Left examples have keyword "distractingworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means there are details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "distractingworld" is to judge that the type of examples are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas the BP really ought to have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Left examples have keyword "distractingworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "distractingworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas it really ought to have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Distractingworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

Left examples have keyword "distractingworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas it really ought to have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Smallworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

Smallworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

BP1105 was created as an extreme example of this. All images in that BP show the same distractingly detailed background, irrelevant to the solution.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas it really ought to have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas are the nice ideas it really ought have been about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

BP1105 was created as an example of this.

Smallworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

BP1105 "was created as an example of this.

Smallworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

Smallworld BPs are often arbitrary (left-BP950).

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details that are irrelevant to the solution changing between examples.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas in the BP are the nice ideas it really ought to be about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy", which means details changing between examples that are irrelevant to the solution.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas in the BP are the nice ideas it really ought to be about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties varying that are independent of the solution property.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511, the keyword "noisy": details changing between examples that are irrelevant to the solution.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more specific than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas in the BP are the nice ideas it really ought to be about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties changing between examples that are independent of the solution property.

The class of included examples is distractingly irrelevant to the solution vs. not so.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

This is different than the kind of distraction mentioned in left-BP511 (the keyword "noisy"): details changing between examples that are irrelevant to the solution.

To label a BP "smallworld" is to judge that the type of examples in the BP are more restricted than should have been necessary to communicate the same general solution idea--this involves separating out which ideas in the BP are the nice ideas it really ought to be about, and which ideas seem unimportant and irrelevant. On the other hand, to label a BP "noisy" is just to notice there are extra properties changing between examples, independent of the solution property.

Left examples have keyword "smallworld" on the OEBP.

Arbitrarily specific world could be considered a sort of "noise," opposite to the kind of noise mentioned in BP511 (which is typically a specific case of having too big of a world), since too specific of a world also distracts from the solution property.

Bongard Problems with a world that is arbitrarily more specific than necessary for expressing the solution idea vs. Bongard Problems with an appropriate world.

Problems assigned "smallworld" would often be "arbitrary" (left-BP950).

Bongard Problems with a world that is arbitrarily more specific than necessary for expressing the abstract solution idea vs. Bongard Problems with an appropriate world.

Bongard Problems with a world that is arbitrarily more specific than necessary for expressing the abstract solution idea vs. Bongard Problems with an aesthetically appropriate world.

Bongard Problems with a world that is arbitrarily more specific than necessary for expressing the solution idea vs. Bongard Problems with an aesthetically appropriate world.

Bongard Problems with a world that is arbitrarily larger than necessary expressing the solution idea vs. Bongard Problems with an arbitrarily specific world.

Left examples have keyword "bigworld" on the OEBP. Right examples have keyword "smallworld."

Arbitrarily specific world could be considered a sort of "noise," opposite to the kind of noise mentioned in BP511 (which is typically a specific case of having too big of a world), since too specific of a world also distracts from the solution property.