|
COMMENTS
|
Bongard Problems sorted left have the keyword "seemslike" on the OEBP.
In a "seemslike" Bongard Problem, some relevant information is left out by the way objects are displayed. Solutions to "seemslike" BPs sound like "Seems like a __based on the information available vs. seems like a__ based on the information available". The two sides are typically negations of one another (keyword @notso).
Since there is information missing, examples can only be sorted based on what they seem like, trusting they appear in a way that hints psychologically at what they actually are (see @help). |
|
CROSSREFS
|
Although the rule sorting the underlying objects may be @precise, the rule sorting the projections of the objects with lost information is @fuzzy and @subjective.
See also @left-couldbe (and @right-couldbe), concerning situations in which the information given is enough to determine when some examples fail to satisfy a rule but not enough to determine when they do satisfy the rule, the Bongard Problem's solution being "could be ___ vs. clearly is not". In contrast to "seemslike" Bongard Problems, @left-couldbe Bongard Problems can be @precise; both evidence of fitting right and absence of evidence of fitting right is clear-cut, so no psychologically helpful hints (@help) are needed. |